米汤

世界真小. It's a small world!
个人资料
  • 博客访问:
正文

CS实习无非三目的:拿全职,帮找全职或RO实习,发论文项目帮找工申博;录会论文可能值成千上万刀,有些还需推迟入职损失收入

(2026-03-17 10:15:15) 下一个

https://www.saastr.com/20vc-x-saastr-this-week-anthropic-sues-the-government-the-death-of-the-junior-and-why-gentle-deceleration-is-over/

The Death of the Junior Is Where Data Center Budgets Come From

The enterprise is willing the replacement of humans into existence. And it’s accelerating because they want it to accelerate. The category getting hit hardest and fastest: junior roles.

No one wants to hire junior developers. No one wants to train junior lawyers for two years before they can work on a real case. No one wants junior SDRs who don’t know the tools. And the evidence is everywhere.

At Penn State (not a top-10 school, but a large, well-respected state university), there are essentially zero tech recruiting visits for CS and math grads. Six students in the class have offers, because they’re publishing research on Jensen fine-string theory that most humans can’t comprehend. Everyone else? Nothing. Not even the C-tier companies are showing up.

This isn’t just anecdotal. The “hire no juniors” movement is being willed into existence across every function. Support? You want experienced humans who know the product cold to handle escalations. Everything else gets automated. Marketing? You don’t need junior content writers when agents can generate and optimize campaigns. Sales? SDR teams are being replaced by AI agents that text prospects, pitch the product, and set up meetings that are fully ready to close.

The economic connection to data centers is direct: when you hire no juniors, you suddenly have budget for $200 to $500 per month in AI compute per senior employee. That senior developer doesn’t need a junior to review their code. They need Claude Code at $200/month plus $20 per code review. The junior’s salary becomes the AI budget.

This should worry everyone. History (including the French Revolution) tells us that dispossessed urban poor can exist indefinitely without political consequence. But when you produce masses of college graduates who played by the rules for 20 years, spent $400,000 on education, and face unemployment? That cohort causes trouble. In 2026 this is going to be an economic issue. In 2027, it’s going to be a political issue.

The technology takes longer to diffuse than Silicon Valley allows, and people are more adaptable than we give them credit for. The macro unemployment numbers probably stay contained. But in isolated pockets, for very targeted demographics (entry-level CS, customer support, legal associates, bookkeeping), there is a meaningful impact on employment right now.

[ 打印 ]
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.