charges for excessive force under specific legal standards
?
Criminal Charges
If an officer’s use of force is found to be unlawful, they may face state or federal criminal charges:
State Charges:?Local prosecutors may charge officers with?assault, battery, or homicide. However, District Attorneys often face political and professional challenges in prosecuting officers they rely on for other cases.
Federal Charges (18 U.S.C. § 242):?The?Department of Justice (DOJ)?can prosecute officers for willfully depriving a person of their constitutional rights under "color of law".
Failure to Intervene:?Officers who witness a colleague using excessive force and fail to stop it can also be?criminally prosecuted.?
?
Civil Liability (Lawsuits)
Most accountability for excessive force occurs through civil litigation, where the burden of proof is lower than in criminal trials.?
Section 1983 Claims:?Under?42 U.S.C. § 1983, individuals can sue state and local officers for civil rights violations.
Monell Claims:?Plaintiffs may sue a municipality or police department if they can prove that an official policy or custom led to the?use of excessive force.
Damages:?Successful lawsuits can result in?monetary compensation?for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.?
?
Recent 2026 Cases
Glendale, AZ (Jan 2026):?An officer was?fired and sued?for the fatal shooting of Dillon Siebeck, who was mistakenly identified as a suspect.
Hazard, KY (Jan 2026):?A federal judge?dismissed a lawsuit?against the former police chief after a settlement was reached regarding 2024 excessive force claims.
ICE Shooting Inquiry (Jan 2026):?Legal debate continues regarding whether an?ICE agent who shot a woman?in Minneapolis can be prosecuted, highlighting the complexities of?federal immunity.
?
Before 2025, several landmark cases and incidents shaped the legal and social framework of police excessive force in the United States.
Tennessee v. Garner (1985):?Established that officers cannot use?deadly force against a fleeing suspect?unless they have "probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others."
Graham v. Connor (1989):?Established the?"objective reasonableness" standard, requiring that use of force be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with 20/20 hindsight.
Scott v. Harris (2007):?Ruled that an officer’s attempt to?terminate a high-speed car chase?that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even if it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury.?
?
High-Profile Historical Incidents
Rodney King (1991):?The?beating of Rodney King?by LAPD officers and their subsequent acquittal sparked the 1992 Los Angeles Riots, one of the most significant periods of civil unrest in U.S. history.
Amadou Diallo (1999):?Unarmed immigrant?Amadou Diallo was shot 41 times?by NYPD officers who mistook his wallet for a gun. All officers involved were acquitted.
Michael Brown (2014):?The fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, led to?widespread protests?and a major DOJ investigation into systemic bias within the Ferguson Police Department.
George Floyd (2020):?The murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis led to the?largest racial justice protests?in decades and resulted in a record?$27 million civil settlement.?
?
Historical Settlements (Pre-2025)
Randy Cox (2023):?Reached a?$45 million settlement, the largest in U.S. history for police misconduct, after being paralyzed during a police van transport in Connecticut.
Laquan McDonald (2014):?Chicago paid a?$5 million settlement?after dashboard camera footage showed Officer Jason Van Dyke shooting the 17-year-old 16 times as he walked away.
Eric Garner (2014):?His family received a?$5.9 million settlement?after his death from a prohibited chokehold during an arrest for selling untaxed cigarettes.